Tom Allison wrote: > I think before you start parroting the same thing 1,000's before you > have griped about I would like to at least present some of my personal > findings in the last 4 months.
Not 1000's times, but many times, yes. hee hee Facts: 1) I am griping about Woody installer. 2) Haven't seen sarge installer -- didn't know it was out. 3) I am NOT griping about a GUI in the installer(in the sense that you seems to have understood, that is why you gave the Windoze example below). I am griping about a better UI though, I wouldn't mind even an ncurses based one which is "easy" and "intuitive". If sarge installer is an improvement, Great!! > I have been trying to work with the installation process of SuSE 8.2 and > RedHat 9.0. Mostly SuSE8.2. > <snipped a bunch of un-necessary examples here> > I will solidly admit that the SuSE GUI installer looks pretty. > But you don't really give a rip about looks if it takes longer or has > other problems. If that's how you really feal about it the either > reconsider Windows (very pretty), design your own front end for Debian, > or check out the other distributions (Knoppix and Libranet) if you must. Your premise in all the above arguments is that I am demanding a *Graphical* UI _only_. Wrong. See the facts above. > But I really was very impressed with the performance that I experienced > on the pre-released nightly build of the sarge-installer. The potential > is there to have a really great installer far better than the commercial > distributions. > > It's a great advance and some really great work. This must be great then. I will try as soon it is released in Sarge. ->HS __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]