Did you think that "only" the RAID5/6 problem is the reason why btrfs is not so common? what is with the performance? and some (important) featrures (not futures ;) ) are missing to catch up ZFS.
best regards Stefan (sorry for my bad english) > Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. August 2018 um 21:09 Uhr > Von: "Matthew Crews" <mailingli...@mattcrews.com> > An: "Anders Andersson" <pipat...@gmail.com> > Cc: "Debian users mailing list" <debian-user@lists.debian.org> > Betreff: Re: does btrfs have a future? (was: feature) > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On August 14, 2018 6:54 AM, Anders Andersson <pipat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Stefan K shado...@gmx.net wrote: > > Before people start discussingfeatures, note that OP uses the > > mostly non-standard spelling "feature" when he means "future". > > Good catch, I thought the subject was strange. > > I think btrfs does have a future once they work out the Raid5/6 write hole, > and patch in a few quality of life changes. > > On the other hand, if ZFS is ever relicensed to be GPL-compatible (and > therefore includable in the Linux kernel directly), then I think that will > kill btrfs outright. > >
