On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 09:10:10PM +0200, john doe wrote: > On 8/19/2018 8:59 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > > > > > On 08/19/2018 02:28 PM, Reco wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 02:04:39PM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > > > > > Note that second field is a mountpoint in fstab(5), as one of the stock > > > records show: > > > > > > > UUID=8f4eeaae-a055-4262-bebb-cf99abe982a5 /var ext4 defaults > > > > 0 2 > > > Yours have a block device name instead of mountpoint: > > > > > > > UUID=900b5f0b-4f3d-4a64-8c91-29aee4c6fd07 /dev/sdb1 ext4 > > > > errors=remount-ro 0 > > > > 1 > > > > UUID=d65867da-c658-4e35-928c-9dd2d6dd5742 /dev/sdc1 ext4 > > > > errors=remount-ro 0 > > > > 1 > > > > UUID=007c1f16-34a4-438c-9d15-e3df601649ba /dev/sdc2 ext4 > > > > errors=remount-ro 0 > > > > 1 > > > So even a stock mount(1) should refuse to mount these. > > > > > > > > > > When I rebooted the computer the OS didn't like the new > > > > fstab and gave me a > > > > number of, at least to me, obscure messages. > > > systemd-mount can be cryptic, I agree. > > > > > > > > > > Obviously, I missed something important. My question is what? > > > It's a kind of dumb question, but where do you need your sdb1, sdc1 and > > > sdc2 mounted? Your fstab(5) does not mention that. > > > > > > Reco > > > > > > > > Well, that's another red faced forehead slapper! > > > > It merely reinforces that I don't know what I'm doing as far as > > hardware is concerned. > > > > It's a good thing that I'm an Organic Chemist and not an IT person. > > > > Instead of trying your new changes in '/etc/fstab' by rebooting, you > could also try 'mount -a'.
Or # findmnt -x > https://linux.die.net/man/8/mount > > -- > John Doe Regards -- Felipe Salvador
