On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:07:31AM +0000, Mark C wrote: > On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 15:47, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > > I'm using that last one, 2.4.20. > > same here from the debian sources, but with a few added patches, > there is no need to download a new kernel, just get the source you have > for the currently running kernel, apply this patch: I already built 2.4.23. Good to get my cpu a bit of exercise once in a while. > > ---------------------- cut --------------------- > --- 1.31/mm/mmap.c Fri Sep 12 06:44:06 2003 > +++ 1.32/mm/mmap.c Thu Oct 2 01:18:19 2003 > @@ -1041,6 +1041,9 @@ > if (!len) > return addr; > > + if ((addr + len) > TASK_SIZE || (addr + len) < addr) > + return -EINVAL; > + So that's the brk bug? Doesn't take much code to wreck havoc, does it. || (addr + len) < addr. Hum. So, wrap around overflow? -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]