On 2018-11-04 00:19 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Right. But if you compare the metdata for mutt in the relevant > Packages files, there is a mismatch. From current stable: > > Package: mutt > Version: 1.7.2-1 > Installed-Size: 6104 > Maintainer: Mutt maintainers <pkg-mutt-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> > Architecture: amd64 > ... > Priority: optional > Filename: pool/main/m/mutt/mutt_1.7.2-1_amd64.deb > Size: 1562454 > MD5sum: ba99d07da2382c1861533e4a55ebe6f8 > SHA256: b4032390b6e0347863558015f2c5dfff19af61145d745351c30be66932d2a9c2 > > > And from stable-security: > > Package: mutt > Version: 1.7.2-1+deb9u1 > Installed-Size: 6108 > Maintainer: Mutt maintainers <pkg-mutt-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> > Architecture: amd64 > ... > Priority: standard > Filename: pool/updates/main/m/mutt/mutt_1.7.2-1+deb9u1_amd64.deb > Size: 1564182 > MD5sum: aa2aa9266ed488bc57e486497dcde2b0 > SHA1: 4dac8ed3ec8dd50de65ff3cb07eef1963d3e96c0 > SHA256: 749a070599b56c923c514cd7b9fab6f94b01c662a9c5c93182366f81990f4d87 > > which suggests there may be a problem with overrides in the security > archive. The overrides file for security isn't available to look at > directly to check...
Is there even an override file on security.debian.org, or uses it the priority from the packages? > I'll talk to the ftp team and see what's going on... That is https://bugs.debian.org/867668. Cheers, Sven