>>>>> <to...@tuxteam.de> writes: >> I think also, but no one uses it except for emacs or some niche >> programming.
> Do your reading before spewing nonsense: > https://leanpub.com/lisphackers/read > (and this is /only/ Common Lisp. There's Racket, Guile and the new Wilber likes Guile :) :) :) > kid on the block, Clojure, each one with its own, quite interesting > projects -- check out Guix for Guile's current hot-spot). > Sorry, that sounds harsh, but that's how fake news are born. You've > got the tendency to state things as if they were true: then you've > got the damned duty to do some research before. Let me add 2 cents. First: http://www.paulgraham.com/lisp.html Second, for a bit of fun: http://www.paulgraham.com/lisp.html My personal experience: Would I like to hang out with lisp hackers? Definitely yes. Can I? I feat the answer is definitely not. In my company (you can guess it from the address domain), I know only another guy who knows Clojure, and he's better than me… But we can't use it on our work. Java, Java, Java, some SQL, more Java. If you are lucky some Scala. Lisp is my lifeboat that saves the day and my brain when nice projects come up like "make GDPR compliant this bunch of legacy applications", situations where you have potentially tons of stupid, mechanical editing. Yet Lisp gave me something useful on my work, and that is not just being used to functional programming, but also being ready to accept that "Ok, guys, here is a place where you have to start thinking _very_ differently from where you were used to"; and understanding why elegance is so good in coding: a piece of elegant code is a piece of code that you actually "feel" is good code, its correctness being almos blatant :). -- /\ ___ Ubuntu: ancient /___/\_|_|\_|__|___Gian Uberto Lauri_____ African word //--\| | \| | Integralista GNUslamico meaning "I can \/ coltivatore diretto di software not install già sistemista a tempo (altrui) perso... Debian" Warning: gnome-config-daemon considered more dangerous than GOTO