On Wed 31 Jul 2019 at 20:18:09 +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Brian wrote: > > > You are misunderstanding. When I said "Neither should have an envy photo > > 7100 entry in models.dat.", I meant that the *stretch* models.dat does > > not have it as an entry. If it is there, it has been put there - and not > > by anything which a stretch inastallation would do. > > - the stretch models.dat does not have an envy entry ==> envy is not seen, > and > of course scanning is not available
Agreed. > - now, it is there because I put it ==> envy is seen, and scanning works > do you see an other solution? Agreed. But you said your was laptop amd64/stretch; it wasn't. models.dat had been altered at some time by you. You failed to mention that. -- Brian.
