Hi,
i wrote:
> > I don't have the mail by Andrei POPESCU in my mailbox,
The Wanderer wrote:
> I do. It has:
> >>> In-Reply-To: <87h8664rvb.fsf@lenovo>
Well, it is not about the In-Reply-To: header itself. Most of our mails
here have one, with just a message id string in <>-brackets.
But something seems to lure Rodolfo Medina's mail client into writing
an unusual text after that id string:
In-Reply-To: <20190826190505.zldub4tzker6am7d@localhost> (Andrei POPESCU's
message of "Mon, 26 Aug 2019 22:05:05 +0300")
A good candidate would be some header line in Andrei's mail which tells
Rodolfo's mail client to send an In-Reply-To: at all, and with that text
add-on in ()-brackets.
(I have yet no idea how this could look like ...)
> If you want the full message, I can probably pass it along as an attachment.
The full header block would be of interest.
(Although i have few hope to spot any strangeness.)
Andrei POPESCU could join this discussion and post a test mail to which
Rodolfo Medina could try to reply. This would help to understand whether
it is in some way a systematic problem between the two mail clients.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
