>> Is this intended behavior, or is this a bug in the installer? If it's
>> a bug, where is the right place to report it to? (I'm not sure which
>> package(s) are involved)
> 
> It is partman-efi[1].  Don't know if there is any particular reason why
> they chose a pass value of 1 rather than 2, but it does not seem to
> cause actual problems.

Thanks! Apparently systemd effectively ignores this field, so there's no
harm either way (as I've now also confirmed by manually changing it to
2).

https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-fstab-generator.html

Reply via email to