On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:01:26 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> What have I missed?
>
> ( postgresql 7.3.4-9 on unstable )
postgresql-client 7.3.4-9 as well?
> I just installed this package. When I try to do, well, anything, it
> says:
>
> psql: could not connect to server: No such file or directory
> Is the server running locally and accepting
> connections on Unix domain socket "/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.0"?
>
> Here's what *is* in the directory after firing up the app:
>
> home:~# ls -l /var/run/postgresql/
> total 4.0K
> srwxrwxrwx 1 postgres postgres 0 Dec 15 00:38 .s.PGSQL.5432=
> -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 28 Dec 15 00:38 .s.PGSQL.5432.lock
This suggests that the database backend is present and listens on the
default port (5432).
> I see no .s.PGSQL.0, so I guess the obvious question is, how do I get one?
The obvious question isn't always the right one. The right one is most
likely: "why is psql looking for /var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.0 rather than
/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432?".
The socket name encodes the port number, so you may want to try if setting
the port number explictly helps:
psql --port 5432 template1
If that helps then you may want to check if/why you have the PGPORT
environment variable set. (I can recreate the behaviour you're seeing when I
set PGPORT to 0 or to a non-numeric value)
HTH,
Ray
--
I think the most important thing about Linux is that it gives people the
ability to do what they want.
Alan Cox in http://www2.linuxjournal.com/articles/culture/012.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
