On Sat 28 Mar 2020 at 10:30:07 (+0200), Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Vi, 27 mar 20, 23:15:12, David Wright wrote: > > > > However, the actual problem that Russell introduced was how a > > character set—any character set—should be encoded in the email header > > parameter's value. And the RFC answer is "not in Base64", which is for > > unstructured fields, as illustrated by the header of my previous post. > > Mutt, as expected, writes conformant values but can be instructed to > > decode particular non-conformant ones. > > So any test involving mutt as source is irrelevant.
Well, I'm not sure who's testing what. AIUI Russell is happy to switch to Thunderbird for those attachments from the cattle raisers association. Richard Hector was unable to save the empty Romanian attachment, so I posted a non-empty version to see whether it was the emptiness or the name that was the problem. No reply. > > > According to > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_alphabet#Digital_typography>, > > > it originally used ISO 8859-2. > > > > … aka Latin-2. Not being Romanian, I can't comment on the relative > > popularity of that and Latin-10 (ISO 8859-16) or whether the latter > > was still-born. And… > > > > > Of course, it would probably use UTF-8 > > > on most modern systems. > > > > Yes, that also seems more up-to-date and expressive, with support for > > distinguishing obscure (to me) variants like cedilla vs comma below. > > Right. > > <rant> > Apparently Microsoft (and Adobe?) had to come up with the support for > Romanian by themselves, because the responsible Romanian entities didn't > bother at the time. Unfortunately they got it wrong (not blaming them, > just stating a fact). > > The wrong characters are still in use now (even though correct support > was included in Windows 7 - for XP there was a language pack), also > because many font creators got confused and didn't implement support > correctly (missing characters, characters in wrong positions, etc). > > This (and the fact that many Romanians don't even bother to use any > diacritics at all) makes searching for exact strings... challenging. > </rant> Cheers, David.