Hi Greg, 16 juin 2020 à 13:23 de wool...@eeg.ccf.org
> It's flaky and full of errors. (Many of these errors end up on the > bash mailing lists as bug reports in bash, but nope, they're from > bash-completion.) It bloats bash, using a lot of memory, and taking > extra CPU and wall-clock time (may not be noticeable on modern hardware). > > That said, many people still find its benefits outweight its problems, > and are quite happy with it. You get to make your own choice. > Thanks. Proofreading the final command is not forbidden, right? ^^ Maybe sometimes completion is not working as it should, nothing is perfect, but globally I think that it saves time more than its wastes. It's probably more a conceptual/philosophical approach here ;) Best regards, l0f4r0
