I guess I misremembered. After the merger they certainly *acted* as if Compaq management was in charge. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
- [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit... Susmita/Rajib
- Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for... The Wanderer
- Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386... Roberto C . Sánchez
- Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as ... John Hasler
- Re: [?] Why should Distros be called... Michael Stone
- Re: [?] Why should Distros be c... John Hasler
- Re: [?] Why should Distros ... Michael Stone
- Re: [?] Why should Dist... John Hasler
- Re: [?] Why should Distros be c... Celejar
- Re: [?] Why should Distros ... Michael Stone
- Re: [?] Why should Distros be c... Stefan Monnier
- Re: [?] Why should Distros ... Michael Stone
- Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386... Andrei POPESCU
- Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as ... Sven Hartge
- [OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distro... Stefan Monnier
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why shou... Sven Hartge
- Re: [EVEN MORE OFFTOPIC] Re... tomas
- Re: [EVEN MORE OFFTOPIC... Sven Hartge