From: "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbe...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 03:49:14 +0500 > My point was, you could've used better or more identifiers to > distinguish between devices, so there is no other device could ever > interfere. For example, what will happen if you plug in another drive > with the same size?
Acknowledged. In the desktop system, this works and avoids the possibility of another /dev/sd?1 of identical size. KERNEL=="sd?1", ENV{ID_SERIAL_SHORT}=="0201202010201000", SYMLINK+="GRNSD", \ OWNER="peter", GROUP="peter" The same fails in the laptop system as the ATTR{size} variant failed. > ... by naming your custom rule "99-*.rules" you will make it to be > processed last, effectively bypassing possible race condition between the > rules. Each of these systems has only one local.rules file. Nevertheless I renamed to 99-local.rules. > Systems could have different card-readers based on different controllers ... For test purposes I use one USB-SD adapter moved between the two systrems. > ... different usb hub devices. The Sharp Mebius laptop also has a PC card (PCMCIA) SD adapter where the SD also fails to work. But it works in the SD socket in a XO-1.5. All evidence is consistent with a failure limited to the Sharp laptop. I should have mentioned earlier that in a previous Debian release the same SD card worked in the Sharp laptop just as in the desktop system. (Don't remember which release.) A bug report may be justified. > I'm sorry, if I wasn't clear enough in previous letter. English is > an every day struggle for me. Assuming English is your 2nd or 3rd or 4th language, your English is excellent. A person learning English after their first language tends to learn the grammar systematically. Whereas I learned grammar mostly by osmosis. =8~| Thanks, ... P. -- mobile: +1 778 951 5147 VoIP: +1 604 670 0140 48.7693 N 123.3053 W