Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > All that being said, other distributions have attmepted to > put a licence on the whole distribution, not > always consistently. > > Red Hat had a copyright on their artwork etc. and required > derivatives to change their branding accordingly. > > Almalinux - a CentOS derivative - has a GPL2 licence over > everything, Rocky Linux, which is essentially identical, is > put out under a 3 clause BSD licence. Debian doesn't have an > overall licence, as others have said, and the trademarks are > liberally licensed. [I'm not sure anyone has used the bottle > logo for a long time]. > > All the very best, as ever,
How does it work with other distro being forks (derivatives) of Debian, or some other distro being a Debian derivative, and so on - what's happening when they first base their distro on Debian, then put their own licence on theirs? -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal