On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 07:15:07AM +0100, hw wrote: > On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 23:05 -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
[...] > Why would anyone use SSDs for backups? They're way too expensive for that. Possibly. > So far, the failure rate with SSDs has been not any better than the failure > rate > of hard disks. Considering that SSDs are supposed to fail less, the > experience > with them is pretty bad. You keep pulling things out of whatever (thin air, it seems). Here's a report by folks who do lots of HDDs and SDDs: https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-hard-drive-stats-q1-2021/ The gist, for disks playing similar roles (they don't use yet SSDs for bulk storage, because of the costs): 2/1518 failures for SSDs, 44/1669 for HDDs. I'll leave the maths as an exercise to the reader. Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature