On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 6:25 AM Jesper Dybdal <jd-debian-u...@dybdal.dk> wrote: > > > On 2023-01-16 13:36, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:42:35AM +0100, Jesper Dybdal wrote: > >> 28969163 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 255 Jun 2 2016 > >> /etc/systemd/system/bind9.service > >> > >> I suspect that the bind9 service ought to be removed. Is that correct? > > ... > > In any case, yeah, I'd get rid of that. Maybe move it to /root/ in case > > you want to refer to it in the future, or whatever. Afterward, do a > > "systemctl daemon-reload". > > > I have now, in order: > * Disabled bind9.service > * Corrected /etc/default/named so the named service can start (it was > missing the chroot) > * Stopped bind9.service > * Started named.service and checked that named i actually running > * Deleted /etc/systemd/system/bind9.service > * Deleted /etc/default/bind9 > * Run systemctl daemon-reload > * Checked that "systemctl restart named.service" works > > That leaves one file in the system with the name "bind9.service": > /var/lib/systemd/deb-systemd-helper-enabled/multi-user.target.wants/bind9.service > Can I safely delete that one (I suspect so)? Will it be a problem > during reboot if I leave it?
if you are manually deleting the bind9 gear, you may as well go full in. You can't get half pregnant. Find the bind9 artifacts left on the system: find /etc -name 'bind9*' Then whack it: find /etc -name 'bind9*' -exec rm -f {} \; Jeff