On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:54 PM Dan Ritter <d...@randomstring.org> wrote:

> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:05:16PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > The reasons that there are quite a few charities that I do not
> contribute to
> > > has to do with two (related) things:
> >
> > Quite the Scientific Method (TM). Making a few things up to make your
> > point :-)
> >
> > Now: Pick one. Prove that it's bad (for a 501, as the SPI is, it
> > should be feasible: AFAIK their records are open)
>
> Because SPI is a US registered charity, it is covered by
> charitynavigator.or <http://charitynavigator.org>g
>

I use Amazon Smile with SPI so my shopping benefits open source.


> https://www.charitynavigator.org/ein/113390208
>
> which says that as of the last tax failing, SPI spent 94% of
> income on their purpose, rather than overhead.
>
> -dsr-
>
>

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀

Reply via email to