Andy Smith writes:
>
> It is almost as if one small set of metrics aren't enough to decide,
> for everyone, in every case, which language should be used!
>
> Similarly, the idea posted in this thread to objectively quantify
> every feature a language can possibly have and then see which one
> has the most, so we can dub that language "the best": This ignores
> the fact that people have been doing research for 50+ years into
> creating the academically perfect programming language. Even if any
> group of people COULD agree objectively on those metrics, what
> succeeds in the marketplace of ideas (and indeed, the literal
> marketplace) would not be determined by those metrics alone.
>
Yep. Remember BNF/EBNF/ABNF context free grammars?
John
--
John Conover, cono...@panix.com, http://www.johncon.com/
