On Fri 01 Dec 2023 at 16:32:44 (+0000), Joe wrote: > On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 17:12:56 +0100 > Marco Moock <m...@dorfdsl.de> wrote: > > Am 01.12.2023 um 15:55:41 Uhr schrieb Joe: > > > > > I received a message timed 22:52 on 28th, the last that day, the > > > next three were on 29th at > > > 08:39 > > > 13:14 > > > 15:55 > > > then normal flow was resumed, which is typically about 50 messages > > > per day. > > > > > > So yes, there was a problem. > > > Times UTC by the way. > > > > IIRC the amount of messages varies depending on how much people take > > part in discussions. > > > > I don't think the current behavior is unusual. > > > > No, it's fine now, but there definitely was a blockage on the 29th. It > returned to normal about 16:00 UTC and has been OK since then.
I can certainly see the gap you mention—I got nothing from the list between 2023-11-28 22:34:58+00:00 (arrived in ~Manchester 2023-11-28T22:35:24+00:00) and 2023-11-29 17:49:37+00:00 (arrived 2023-11-29T17:50:03+00:00) /unless/ I just happen to have deleted everything in that period (unlikely as I have the entirety of gene's thread). Looking at everything I still have from the list over 28th/29th (in Central time), I only see two trivial delays between posting and delivery here: Felix M (~5 min) and Dan R (15 min). What I don't see is any posts sent during that gap but delivered afterwards. PS Your clock is ahead, Dan P. Cheers, David.