On 2/26/24 20:52, Gareth Evans wrote:
Replied to OP by mistake, reposting to list.
On Sun 25/02/2024 at 05:34, David Christensen <dpchr...@holgerdanske.com> wrote:
debian-user:
Is Debian 12.5.0 amd64 affected by OpenZFS bug #15526?
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-12.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/zfs-dkms
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/15526
Hi David,
Given the complexity of the issues, I'm not sure if this truly answers your
question, but
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/15933
seems to suggest that or a similar issue is still ongoing with Open ZFS 2.2.3,
which is later than the version currently available from bookworm or
bookworm-backports.
It seems bookworm-backports might eventually provide the solution, if at all,
per the Debian wiki on ZFS:
"it is recommended by Debian ZFS on Linux Team to install ZFS related packages from
Backports archive. Upstream stable patches will be tracked and compatibility is always
maintained."
https://wiki.debian.org/ZFS
Currently:
$ apt policy zfs-dkms
zfs-dkms:
Installed: 2.2.2-4~bpo12+1
Candidate: 2.2.2-4~bpo12+1
Version table:
*** 2.2.2-4~bpo12+1 100
100 https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports/contrib amd64
Packages
100 https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports/contrib i386
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
2.1.11-1 500
500 https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm/contrib amd64 Packages
500 https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm/contrib i386 Packages
Hope that helps.
Gareth
That you for citing OpenZFS bug #15933.
These appear to be the ZFS packages for the available Debian releases:
https://packages.debian.org/buster/zfs-dkms
buster zfs-dkms (0.7.12-2+deb10u2)
buster-backports zfs-dkms (2.0.3-9~bpo10+1)
bullseye zfs-dkms (2.0.3-9+deb11u1)
bullseye-backports zfs-dkms (2.1.11-1~bpo11+1)
bookworm zfs-dkms (2.1.11-1)
bookworm-backports zfs-dkms (2.2.2-4~bpo12+1)
trixie zfs-dkms (2.2.2-4)
The question is, how far back to go? Is OpenZFS 2.1.x buggy? OpenZFS
2.0.x? What is 0.7.12 -- OpenZFS, ZFS-on-Linux, or something else --
and is it buggy?
David