Joerg Rossdeutscher([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > Hi, > > Am Sa, den 10.01.2004 schrieb Wayne Topa um 19:52: > > Lorenzo Rossi([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > If you remove the Message-Id: you might run into some problems. I > > have found that a lot of spam 'does not' include that header. > > That will not happen, since every mailserver that gets a mail in his > fingers is adviced to generate an ID if missing.
Thats right, and my point is: I find that when mail, without a Message-Id:, is received by my ISP, 'they' add that header. So if I find a Message-Id with my ISP in that header, its deleted. I have not had a false positive using that rule. It's been working now for 3 months and catches an average of 10 spam mails per day. That is why I mentioned it. Makes no difference to me what you do tho. Go for it. Wayne -- One good reason why computers can do more work than people is that they never have to stop and answer the phone. _______________________________________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]