You seem to be suggesting that Debian users now need to read XX pages of 
release notes and guides in order to learn that what they're installing is not 
what the Debian.org homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy", and "Who We Are / 
What We Do" pages are currently promoting Debian as.

That's not right. Period. If the Installers are not ALL going to give users the 
choice to opt-in or opt-out of non-free components, then those above-mentioned 
promotional pages really need to be updated so as to not be misleading users. 

But BETTER yet, why not just update all the installers to give users that 
choice? That's what I'm strongly suggesting. Something very 
wrong/misleading/deceptive is happening right now.

Regarding "perhaps it could be spelled out more explicitly... that live media 
is primarily for trying out Debian": Using those live image Debian installers 
has been very convenient up through Bullseye because they automatically 
installed a preferred Desktop. But if those installers are now also going 
install 29 non-free packages without clear warning and without opt-in/out 
choices (as they currently are), then there should be a GIANT RED WARNING on 
the live-image download page of that fact. All those live images also contain 
installers, and it's unreasonable to expect that people who are trying Debian 
out would not later use the built-in installer if they like what they've tried. 
But at the moment, it they do use those installers, what they're getting is not 
what's been promoted on Debian homepage "Why Debian", "Our Philosophy" and "Who 
We Are / What We Do" pages.

This is about Doing what's right and/or Telling the truth. Best would be both. 
But what's currently happening is neither.

P.S. Regarding your link to 
https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/ch02s02.en.html , those 
instructions don't even work on the live images. Worse, they don't say that 
they don't work on the live images. So even if a user reads that entire guide, 
they'll only get instructions that don't even work. That's deceptive.

This is in reply to: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00325.html

Original post: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/04/msg00324.html

Reply via email to