Don't tell just me. Please reply to the list. On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:28:23 -0400 e...@gmx.us wrote:
> On 6/4/24 12:44, Charles Curley wrote: > [...] > [...] > [...] > > I did that a while back, when I set the monitors up this way. They > were arranged correctly once I logged in. It's just in lightdm that > they were wrong. They are correct now (I actually don't know why, > unless it's ignoring the hash mark for that line), but I get those > errors, which might be related to it not going into suspend overnight. > > I modified lightdm's config on 20 May (so says my log), but: > > eben@cerberus:~$ sudo journalctl | grep xrandr | uniq -c > --check-chars=6 3015 May 24 21:25:03 cerberus lightdm[2714286]: > xrandr: cannot find mode 1920x1200 > 13581 May 25 00:41:10 cerberus lightdm[2823087]: xrandr: cannot > find mode 1920x1200 > 14599 May 26 01:35:52 cerberus lightdm[282746]: xrandr: cannot > find mode 1920x1200 > 17512 May 27 01:02:53 cerberus lightdm[951063]: xrandr: cannot > find mode 1920x1200 > 18670 May 28 00:38:05 cerberus lightdm[1676638]: xrandr: cannot > find mode 1920x1200 > 13689 May 29 00:34:24 cerberus lightdm[2413887]: xrandr: cannot > find mode 1920x1200 > 14006 May 30 01:52:22 cerberus lightdm[3092520]: xrandr: cannot > find mode 1920x1200 > 14376 May 31 01:40:14 cerberus lightdm[3751983]: xrandr: cannot > find mode 1920x1200 > 15296 Jun 01 00:58:00 cerberus lightdm[206925]: xrandr: cannot > find mode 1920x1200 > 16280 Jun 02 00:00:00 cerberus lightdm[175982]: xrandr: cannot > find mode 1920x1200 > 13209 Jun 03 02:25:20 cerberus lightdm[909251]: xrandr: cannot > find mode 1920x1200 > 12630 Jun 04 01:56:54 cerberus lightdm[1546837]: xrandr: cannot > find mode 1920x1200 > > There are no errors on the 23rd related to xrandr, so I suspect > something happened on the 24th. > > <investigation happens> > > The logged event right before lightdm started acting up was > May 24 21:25:01 cerberus dbus-daemon[1362]: [session uid=1000 > pid=1362] Activating service name='org.xfce.Xfconf' req> > May 24 21:25:01 cerberus dbus-daemon[1362]: [session uid=1000 > pid=1362] Successfully activated service 'org.xfce.Xfco> > > Maybe that dbus update was bad? Or I only updated part of it or > something? > > -- > > This message was created using recycled electrons. > -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/blog/
