[email protected] wrote: > See reply below. > > On 1/7/26 8:47 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Michel Verdier wrote: > >> I think they need better intelligence to better use their data. > > > > Actually i think that current AI lacks of disciplined and good > > willing reasoning rather than of IQ. > > > > It is astounding how far ye olde Perceptron made it meanwhile by > > being augmented with oddities like non-linear voodoo layers or > > 8-bit floating point number arithmetic. Remembering the > > intelligence tests of my younger years i'd expect to be beaten by > > AI on many of their topics. > > > > But as small the space of combinations of xorrisofs arguments is > > compared to the size of an AI parameter space, the AIs are still not > > able to correcty answer a question like "How to modify a bootable > > ISO of distro XYZ ?". (I pick up the debris of their flawed answers > > in the internet.) > > > > > > Joe wrote: > >> The problem is that 'AI' is a hoax, there is no 'I'. What we have > >> now is ELIZA with about a trillion times as many computer > >> resources, but not a single bit more actual intelligence, since we > >> don't know how to make that. > > > > We only know one way to make human intelligence and it is quite > > similarly obscure as AI training if we consider the ~ 3.5 billion > > years of evolution which enabled our mass production of humans. And > > many of them will never qualify for what we as computer oriented > > people are undisputedly willing to call "intelligence". > > Whose mass production of humans? > > Our God ALONE! > > He says, "I AM THAT I AM", He has always been and always will be > forever! > > As mortal humans living a few decades at best, how can we suggest > that "we" are producing people? Have scientists created life? They > never will create because only God can create. > > I took the liberty to state my convictions here just as others were > stating their beliefs. > > Have a good day! Remember each person has been influenced and will > continue to influence, but only for time, not eternity. Let's prepare > to give account of our actions.
Was that AI slop or not? Was it something worse? I'll get my coat... > >> It's a large-scale expert system that hasn't been trained by > >> experts.
