[email protected] wrote: 
> Background: I switched to T-Mobile for my Internet connection (via 5G) and, 
> as 
> far as speed and lack of interruptions, it works fine for me, but I have a 
> few 
> problems:
> 
>    * I'm not asking about this, just noting it: The address of the TMO-G4AR 
> device is 192.168.12.1 and cannot be changed (and certainly not from the .12 
> "subnet" (right word?)), which meant I had to reconfigure all my devices, 
> some 
> of which I forgot how to do.:-(  (Ok now ;-)
> 
>    * The TMO-G4AR device is not a router, but it does NAT (I think it does 
> DHCP also, but I'm not using that at all, I use static (IPv4) addresses), 
> does 
> not do routing, and cannot be switched to bridge mode.

If it does NAT, then by definition it is a router. It may not be
a very good or configurable one, but it has two interfaces and
selectively routes packets from one to the other while changing
them (NAT).

> I had my devices working for a while (a few months) but had no occasion to do 
> anything like ssh between them.  Today I had a need and realized that I 
> cannot 
> ssh (or ping) between them because the TMO does not do routing.
> 
> The question(s): I have a Ubiquiti Edge Router X which I used with my 
> previous 
> cable based ISP.  I'd like to add it back to the LAN to enable communications 
> between devices, but because the TMO device does NAT and so would the Edge 
> Router, I'll have a double NAT setup -- I'm worried about that especially for 
> my VOIP communications.

Any of these three options are available to you:

* You can turn off NAT on the EdgeRouter, connect it to the TMO
thing, and go from there.

* You can connect the TMO thing to the EdgeRouter on a LAN port
instead of a WAN port, and avoid NAT that way.

* You can buy a cheap ethernet switch ($20-40) and connect it to
the TMO thing, then connect the other computers to the switch.

> 2. The slightly more complicated one for me to explain is to somehow stick 
> with one Ethernet interface per computer, run each to a switch, and have 
> those 
> switches interface to both the TMO and the Edge Router.  Again, I'm guessing 
> this could be made to work, and would require "gymnastics" of some sort.

What would the EdgeRouter be doing in this scenario?

-dsr-

Reply via email to