Speaking very personally, that seems like an innovation problem, not a
browser one.
Progressive enhancement web design is the essence of quality design modern
or otherwise.
That folks are grabbing the latest design tool to create items does not
dismiss the abilities of browsers to render content in a simple
meaningful way.
w3m presents the content of this radio station site profoundly well..and
even Elinks exists now, with JavaScript support..in DOS.
I stated in another answer that Linux needs quality screen readers too,
graphical interface environment demonstrates that even better then the cli.
Still, many Linux users work in the command line, without the adaptive
technology factor.
Saying that cli browsers are less functional, simply restates my
point..does not mean they cannot do better though.
Kare.
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026, Marco Moock wrote:
Am 10.06.26 um 00:30 schrieb Karen Lewellen:
At least for the command line..plus better pr.
Honestly, Linux is everywhere, under so many things.
Yet, when I am trying to enter a radio contest, even the graphical
browsers cannot get into a text box.
Sorry to rant, but given how much stuff needs a smartphone, it makes me
cry.
The major graphical browsers are supported on Linux too - even Edge can run
there.
The CLI browsers do not support all of the features, so many websites will
not work.
Bad, but that is the result of "modern web design".
--
Gruß
Marco
Spam bitte an [email protected]
