On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:52:23 -0400 The Wanderer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2026-08-21 at 14:43, Jean-Christophe wrote: > > > Here is a respectful and articulate response in English: > > Especially given the inclusion of that line, this reads very strongly > as if it were written by a LLM, AKA "generative AI". > > Given that the message you're responding to explicitly includes the > statement > > >> I am not interested in conversing with machines This strikes me as a non-sequitur. Who is conversing with a machine? Jean-Christophe may have used an AI. So what? He is solely reponsible for the product, not the AI. You are conversing with him, not the AI. If [email protected] takes offense at Jean-Christophe's reply, I'm sure he can make an articulate and courteous response. I don't think he needs you to do it for him. -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/blog/
