On 2026-10-04 11:03:38 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> Notice that in #34668 you complain concerning man pages that actually are
> maintained by a separate project. It may be annoying to glibc developers.

No, Debian's version of the nscd(8) man page is part of the
glibc source:

qaa:~> apt-file search man/man8/nscd.8
nscd: /usr/share/man/man8/nscd.8.gz       

glibc being the source package of nscd, and in the man page:

GNU C Library 2.2               January 07, 2001                        NSCD(8)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> This bug report indirectly says that users expect to find man pages that may
> be more convenient than info manuals. On the other hand, it is for those who
> defines GNU&FSF policies. Glibc developers just follow imposed rules. It is
> better to ask for actions that may be performed by project developers, e.g.
> to add .texi docs.

The glibc manual does not provide any information about nscd!!!

> > the issue is in Debian, which apparently comes from BSD. In
> > bookworm:
> > 
> > NSCD(8)                   BSD System Manager's Manual                  
> > NSCD(8)
> >                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/nscd/nscd.8.en.html
> I see no "BSD":
> "NSCD(8)      System Manager's Manual         NSCD(8)"

The "BSD System Manager's Manual" is not part of the nscd.8 file.
But it appears with "man nscd". There may be something obscure
involved.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Pascaline project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Reply via email to