On Saturday 14 February 2004 11:58 am, Abdul Latip wrote: > Once in a while, users are asking me about the compatibilty problem of > Linux. They reasoning that M$Office can be installed anywhere like > Win98, WinME, WinNT, et. al.
Actually, many Windows app CDs come with multiple installers for the various versions of Windows. The installer just detects the version of Windows and runs the correct installer - it's transparent to the user. The same thing could be done on Linux, but there's not much point. Most CDs come from the distro itself (and are therefore packaged correctly), and download sites usually carry packages for most of the distros (if the distro doesn't already provide it). > Whereas it is hard to install a RedHat package into Debian, and so on. Mostly because a RedHat and Debian package that provides the same thing may have a slightly different name, version number, or feature set. Factor in the dependencies a package has, and you can see where the difficulty comes in. > It seems they are not so backward compatible? Mostly because of changes in dependencies (including glibc). However, many Linux distributions (including Debian) backport newer versions of packages, so backwards compatibility issues don't come up that often. Even if you have to upgrade an application, the upgrade usually costs nothing but time, which is more than I can say for most Windows apps. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
