On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:11:27PM -0700, s. keeling wrote: > Incoming from Joel Konkle-Parker: > > challenges they've had to face. The fact that approximately 6% of our > > archive fails to meet bare minimum expectations leads me to believe that > > we may want to inaugurate a special process for orphaning such packages. > > 'Sounds to me like a job for [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > That might be a great way to draw in potential maintainers (hey, I'd > read it!), and with %96 good vs. %6 bad, the numbers are promising.
More -qa, really, although a bit of both. Working on such broken packages is most certainly an activity that does happen at the moment, but could sometimes do with better organization. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
