Paul Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:38:02AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote: >> The clamav is not a bad solution (although I wouldn't recommend it to a >> company). > > This intrigues me. Why wouldn't you recommend it to a company? Because I have one company that uses it (it also has a commercial one on all the desktops) and it happens (although rarely) that a new virus gets passed through clamav, at least that's what I hear from their sysadmin. since a virus inside a company network can potentially cause much more damage then at home I would be afraid to reccomend that to a company.
Bye > > - -- > .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : :' : > `. `'` proud Debian admin and user > `- Debian. Because it *must* work. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFARZGTUzgNqloQMwcRAq7sAJ9BbDXluHexObGG2W/bEi/0ia1eIQCfV7X8 > lRefq2ZajHD8CZvYyZCrhgg= > =VxX5 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
