on Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:53:02PM +0100, Joerg Johannes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Am Fr, den 26.03.2004 schrieb Derrick 'dman' Hudson um 15:46: > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:59:24AM +0100, Joerg Johannes wrote: > > > > | > Not when using inline PGP signatures, then it's considered valid. > > | > > | OK, sorry for that. But now to something else: I use evolution as mua, > > | and I don't quite understand what to do with inline PGP signatures. > > > > Upgrade them to PGP/MIME. > > > > This configuration is for maildrop, translation to procmail (if > > desired) is an exercise for the reader : > > < snipped maildrop config > > > Thanks, Derrick. But the good thing about using evolution is, NOT having > to use maildrop/procmail/fetchmail and all that stuff.
Typical broken GNOME thinking that modular software design is a Bad Thing. One of many places where GNOME is wrong. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Windows Refund Day II: fight for your right to refund http://www.windowsrefund.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature