On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 01:06:34PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 07:45:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > Some questions for the DPL candidates... > > So, a followup question for Branden: does your lack of response to these > > questions reflect the level of accountability and responsiveness we can > > expect from you if elected? > A sample size of one makes for poor statistical analysis. I suggest you > take a look at the other messages I've posted to this list:
Which seems to indicate you've had plenty of time to reply to questions. > There are also two other alternatives: > 1) You can break your flurry of questions down into a set of mails, each > centered around a given topic (admittedly, it's a bit late for that) Or you could take the initiative and just reply to parts of it in separate mails if that's more suitable for you. > 2) We could use a metric for candidate assessment that doesn't include being > able to rise to arbitrary challenges leveled by arbitrary developers Or you could try not misinterpreting a bunch of questions sent to all the candidates as some sort of offensive, and just reply to them. Both the other candidates managed to do so fairly quickly. And I suspect, somehow, that there's more than just an "arbitrary" developer who's interested in your responses. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Debian: giving you the power to shoot yourself in each toe individually.'' -- with kudos to Greg Lehey
msg01541/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature