On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:18:38PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Well, no. If the issue was resolving confusion, we could just say "main > is 100% DFSG-free software; non-free isn't; both are part of the project; > we distribute both" and rewrite any confusing or misleading claims we > make elsewhere.
I don't think it's a problem with wording or anything. We could write NON-FREE IS NOT PART OF DEBIAN with <blink> tags on www.debian.org, and some people would still think it is when they come across /debian/pool/non-free. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
