-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: > So how about if we go ahead and get this thing moved to a vote, so we > can all get back to working on the sarge installer?
An excellent idea! However, although the minimum discussion period has been exceeded, in the (bit over) two weeks since the GR was proposed there haven't been enough seconds for it to be called to a vote. Here are the posts pertaining to the vote as I have followed them (please post corrections, the secretary has final discretion, etc...): 1) GR proposed by Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> available at <http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200312/msg00011.html> 2) GR seconded by Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> available at <http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200312/msg00012.html> 3) GR seconded by Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> available at <http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200312/msg00064.html> 4) GR modified by Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> available at <http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200312/msg00044.html> 5) GR modification seconded by Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> available at <http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200312/msg00069.html> So, it would seem that the modified GR still needs four additional seconds in order to be officially introduced and be eligible to be called to a vote. - --Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE//jOHKl23+OYWEqURAhtxAJ9CvdPg2tVJHd3PdLJ2aYu4gDWL+gCghJTN +qvtqwvObFVoaU9/69Xe6lQ= =++bZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
