On 2004-01-18 10:31:05 +0000 Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dropping non-free would prevent Debian developers from distributing > > any > > non-free packages (such as GFDL).
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 11:07:05AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > That is not true. Why? Because people aren't following the DFSG? GFDL does not satisfy DFSG. non-free is place for packages not satisfying DFSG. > > That, and I [perhaps arrogantly] believe that there is some value to > > our users in the packages distributed by debian. > > So do I, but nothing in the rest of your message relates to this > statement and nothing in this proposal affects them. I also believe > there is some value in the DFSG and it would be better if all packages > distributed by debian meet them. You might want to start by thinking about what that means. [See above comments about GFDL.] Or has GFDL been updated so that GFDL packages can comply with DFSG? -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
