On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:18:10AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:40:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > For comparison, from the social contract rewrite I mentioned a while ago, > > ] We will build a free operating system > > ] We will create and provide an integrated system of free software that > > ] anyone can use. We will make all our work publically available as free > > ] software. We will accept and support the use of the Debian > > ] distribution by all users for all purposes, without discrimination. > > -- http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/social_contract.html > Are you going to propose that as a ballot option?
I don't think it's on point for the question of "should we keep or remove non-free", and I think that's a much more important issue to address first. (ie, "no") OTOH, when we come to cleaning up the social contract properly, I might. Dunno. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
