Hi. OK, I admit I am late. I wanted to ask this some days ago, but apparently forgot about it, and now, the voting period already started. If you feel for some reason that it is inappropriate to answer this question after the voting period has started, I'll have to accept this. Please accept my apologies for asking this so late, but I cant resist to still try it:
I have seen lots of discussions about CDD and splitting up Debian into a core and more-or-less independent topic specific sections recently. While I can perfectly understand the motivation behind these discussions, I have one particular "fear" in this direction. To the candidates: What do you think how we should determine which software components go into the core system, and which have to go into separately provided "distros"? On which criteria, in our opinion, should we base those decisions? I'd like to explain in more detail what I am trying to get at, but I am a bit afraid that this would tell everyone what I am actually wanting to hear, so I'll wait for the first replies before I go into more detail. -- CYa, Mario | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/> | Get my public key via finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
