* Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040408 05:17]: > as for RFCs and other documentation, the jury is still out on whether they can > be included in main. no final decision has been made. you shouldn't pre-empt > that decision by declaring them to be an attempt to sneak non-free stuff in > main.
Could you please try to avoid pre-empting? As the decision you talk about is about non-free stuff in main, talking as if it might be free by lurking about "inclusion in main" is in my eyes far more objectable than presume bad intentions. > for years (since the start of Debian), they HAVE been considered free > enough to go in main. it's only the loony exteremists who have been trying to > kick out GNU documentation in the last few years to make a stupid point (and, > presumably, to prove that they are Holier Than Stallman). I think such a statement speaks enough for itself that contradicting is not needed... ;-> > > Um, I have nothing against having "non-free", I'm against having non-free > > stuff in "main". Hello?!? Not the same thing. > > they're the same old lies, though, and we've heard them over and over again. Saying "lies" is not very nice, isn't it? I don't know what the other people involved did, but I voted for keeping non-free. And one of my main reasons is that I want main to be free of non-free. MfG, Bernhard R. Link -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]