On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 11:33:01AM -0400, David B Harris wrote: > The important part of my sentence was the first part - it "covers > everything". Including actually releasing Sarge, which your proposal > doesn't :)
A change to the Constitution does have to mention any specific version of Debian. If I had proposed such a thing, I would have failed immediately. Resolving what happens to sarge would be a matter of applying the new version of the SC to sarge+1. I can't believe we have to spell these things out. -- Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wookimus.net/ assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature