On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 07:10:37PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:06:00AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > * Can Craig and people who seconded original proposal [2] to second > > this as the formal rationale for Craig's proposal [1]? > > There doesn't seem to be any formal requirement for rationales to be > seconded. > > Personally, I don't agree with all of the statements which have been > prosposed as rationale, I think it's enough to point out that other > people think they are significant.
In order to reflect this fact, I used "rationale raised for this proposal" ^^^^^^ So if you have better expression for this to reflect the situation, I will appreciate your suggestion. Osamu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature