On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 06:32:11 +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Graham Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040605 06:25]: >> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:01:18AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: >> > I think that you also mean me with your mail. Perhaps you're >> > right, and it may be the best to drop both proposals F and G from >> > the ballot. I wouldn't stand in the way of dropping both >> > proposals together from the ballot, and vote about the remaining >> > proposals now. >> By dropping proposal F from the ballot, we are dropping the only >> proposal that does not support releasing Sarge as is. We will not >> drop a proposal simply because you disagree with it. > But we should drop proposal G because simply because some other > people disagree? Or did I understand the latest mails wrong? No. Proposal G is not on the ballot because a) it is trying to contravene a foundation doc without actually overruling it, and b) it has unrelated issues in the same proposal, This is not a matter of not liking G. manoj -- > I get the following error messages at bootup, could anyone tell me > what they mean? fcntl_setlk() called by process 51 (lpd) with broken > flock() emulation They mean that you have not read the documentation > when upgrading the kernel. seen on c.o.l.misc Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]