* Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040620 17:10]: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:56:49PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > [ ] Choice 6: Reaffirm the current SC [needs 1:1] > > Choice 6 is titled wrong. It's not a reaffirmation of the social > > contract, it's an affirmation of a certain interpretation of the > > social contract. An affirmation of another interpretation of the > > social contract was not allowed to be put on the ballot.
> Not allowed? Really? And all this time I thought that my opinion was simply > in a minority so small that nobody bothered making a proposal out of it! :) See http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/06/msg00000.html (for the proposal, seconded by Eduard Bloch, Michael Schiansky, Marco d'Itri, Marc Haber, John H. Robinson (IV), giving the required quorum of the constitution), and rejected by the secretary in that form because it also spoke about the release interval, see http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/06/msg00035.html | I am just saying that portions of this proposal, as it reads | now, do not address the issue that the current GR addresses, and | must needs go on another ballot, and another vote. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]