On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:28:06AM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 04:43:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > Can you please refer me to the discussions in question? As far as I can > > tell, both Steve and I (release assistants) have an entirely different > > impression, and between us we proposed some of the options on the > > ballot. > > I can't remember the thread off-hand, but I believe the idea is that > some people feel the changes to the social contract were only editorial. > > Given this, some people might think that only the release policy has > changed, and that reverting the changes from GR 2004-03 won't change the > meaning of the social contract, because it has always been the same. > > If you accept this line of reasoning, the amendments that attempt to > revert to the previous wording won't have any affect.
Now that I look back over the ballot, I don't think this would apply to your amendment Colin, but only to Proposals A, B, and D. -- gram -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]