On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 12:16:26PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> You're implying here that those things were allowed under a valid
> interpretation of the original SC.

Given historical practice, that's not an unreasonable interpretation.

-- 
Raul


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to