On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:57:20AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > That was because the voters were 20% of the developers, as you well > > know. I'm also hoping that we've engaged enough of the developers that > > we might get a representative vote this time. > > I see. Is that what the Constitution says? If you don't like who > won, then just keep proposing GRs, claiming that not enough people > voted last time? When you lose a vote, raise as big a stink as > possible and have more votes? You really think this is a good > procedure?
Not in general. In this case a number of developers feel (rightly or wrongly) that they were misled by the previous ballot, and wanted another chance to influence Debian policy. I think that you can reasonably expect this to happen again next time the developers feel they are misled. I don't think we need to debate whether or not the ballot was misleading yet again. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]