[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes:
> > Do you wish Debian to be known for providing non-free software? The > > social contract says that Debian is 100% free software, yet you quite > > clearly point out above Debian has an obvious double standard. We say > > Debian is 100% free software and yet it isn't really. Debian has been > > providing non-free software and people expect this of us now. When we > > start tossing around the idea of changing that, it becomes obvious that > > many of us don't really mean for Debian to be 100% free software. > I would suspect that you should already know what many said before on that > topic. Non-free is supposedly NOT a part of the Debian DISTRIBUTION, so This is correct. > Debian IS 100% free software, isn't it?? What most people opposed to the GR The Debian Distribution is. The Debian Project is not. > are afraid of is that the non-free would be taken away from the Debian > *infrastrucure* which is NOT identical to the *Debian distribution*. If the That is correct. > facts I outlined are true, then the GR doesn't make sense at all! ANd that's Why? Why does it not make sense to remove the non-free software from the Debian Project? > the whole point - the GR is a purely political move (and not a very clean, > moral and right one...) > > regards, > marek -- John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.complete.org Sr. Software Developer, Progeny Linux Systems, Inc. www.progenylinux.com #include <std_disclaimer.h> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>