On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 04:08:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 06:34:38PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Well, no. People (well, at least one of them) think the only > > constitutionally sound way of offering an alternative to be voted on > I guess voting NO is not a sufficiently vigorous way of registering one's > disagreement... That doesn't really provide a good way of providing alternative ways of solving a problem. Imagine if the logo vote had been done by voting in turn on each logo in turn rather than by having a single vote. -- Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trying to avoid grumpiness) http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ EUFS http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/
