On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 03:03:27AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 07:45:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > So. The first question is is this dissatisfaction justified? How long is > > the woody release taking compared to other releases? Well, that's easy: > > version codename freeze-date release-date development/freeze > > 1.1 buzz ? 1996/06/17 > > 1.2 rex ? 1996/12/12 6 months > > 1.3 bo ? 1997/06/05 6 months > > 2.0 hamm 1998/02? 1998/07/23 8 + 6 = 14 months > > 2.1 slink 1998/11/03 1999/03/10 4 + 4 = 8 months > > 2.2 potato 2000/01/16 2000/08/15 [10] + 7 = [17] months > > 3.0 woody - 2002/04? ~18 + ~2 = 20 months? > I think something went wrong with your maths here ... potato was 10 + 7 > = 17 months, so woody hasn't been quite so much slower than potato as > you suggest.
How utterly bizarre. I copied the table from a previous mail to -devel [0] which had the right sums too. Cheers, aj [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2000/debian-devel-200005/msg00025.html -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> We came. We Saw. We Conferenced. http://linux.conf.au/ ``Debian: giving you the power to shoot yourself in each toe individually.'' -- with kudos to Greg Lehey